The Washington Post: 56 percent of Americans disapprove of FBI decision to exonerate Hillary Clinton
FBI Director James Comey said on July 5 that Hillary Clinton should not be charged for her use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state. Here’s what he said, in three minutes.
By Scott Clement
July 11, 2016
A majority of Americans reject the FBI’s recommendation against charging Hillary Clinton with a crime for her State Department e-mail practices and say the issue raises concerns about how she might perform her presidential duties, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Six in 10 voters say the outcome will have no impact on their vote this November, even as those who do largely say it discourages them from backing the presumptive Democratic nominee.
Last week’s decision by FBI Director James B. Comey resulted in the Justice Department’s decision that Clinton would not face criminal prosecution which could have derailed her presidential bid. But Comey’s sharp critique of Clinton’s email practices and systematic dismantling of her public defenses stocked critics with fresh ammunition for the general election campaign.
The Post-ABC poll found 56 percent disapprove of Comey’s recommendation against charging Clinton while 35 percent approve. The survey mentioned Comey’s reasoning that Clinton did not have criminal intent but that he found her actions were extremely careless handling e-mails.
Roughly 6 in 10 independents disapprove of the recommendation against charges (59 percent), rising to nearly 9 in 10 Republicans (88 percent) and falling to 31 percent of Democrats.
While Clinton has defended her practice as a matter of personal convenience similar to her predecessors, 57 percent in the poll say the issue worries them about how she might handle responsibilities if elected president, while 39 percent say it’s not related to how she would perform as president. Over 4 in 10 say they are “very worried” about the issue’s implications for Clinton’s performance as president.
To read expanded article, click here.

And the Libs made a fool of themselves at that hearing.
But today at Lynch’s hearing the Libs really out classed themselves on ignorance by changing the subject completely to mass shootings.
I am thankful the last two hearings were televised.
Now I am listening to Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton who have united for the socialist/liberal cause.
Amazing how Bernie thinks Hillary will be our savior now that he lost.
Two freakin gas bags.
Comey is a despicable political hack and always has been. He has let clinton off on two prior occaisons. Can you say Corrupt Comey or FBI= Famous But Incompetent
Kenny, aren’t you living off a government pension, social security disability??? So, give it back if you are so unhappy , see what the GOP really thinks of you
See how sympathetic the Conservatives are.
LOL
3 shut up.
@3 what does your stupid ass comment have to do with these two hearing that just took place?
Thank you for your liberal logic.
Kenny
Admit it dude you suck off the public tit
As do your defenders
LOL
3 - you dumA55!
S/he is among the other 44% wbo are dumba55es
@6 who do you suck on?
Jealous you don’t have a retirement or won’t have one of any substance?
Independently wealthy? Good for you.
7 I love it, you can’t refute the truth so you resort to he- man tactics
Pathetic
Kenny retirement is a blessing. He is lucky to receive a cent. If he had been a true “anti corruption” guy don’t you think he would’ve recieved more? Lol. I’ve said it once before and say it again. Either he was part of the “corrupt system” when he worked for us or he wasn’t. If he tries to say he wasn’t, then look at his length of employment. My guess is that the system wasn’t corrupt until he was fired and then all do the sudden he became an outspoken opponent claiming shit. We can see through your lies.
#6 I defend Kenny when appropriate and I am working 70 hours per week at age 60.
LOL Joe you continue to call BS with no specifics.
You obviously have no idea what I reported or didn’t report that was or wasn’t corrupt. That’s why you can’t be specific.
Time in employement was 20 years.
Tell everyone how I might have had my pension taken away stupid?
Suddenly outspoken Joe? I spoke out on your dumbass every time you stepped on your manhood. All you could do is walk away.
Since the invention of social media you have now become brave. That is hilarious. Of course with the use of intoxicamts it ups the bravado even more.
You should have been man enough to call me a liar to my face Joe. The outcome would have been worth it. Still time if you’re drunk enough?
Steve Brow there are many in your shoes at the present. I get it.
The few I know they will be working till 70. It’s happens when so many love the Bernie Sanders types.
Mills why don’t you just be quiet. You are no match for anyone on this blog. You have proven beyond any doubt you’re a fool. Kenny beats you down like a red headed step child. God Bless.
Mills, perhaps you can explain how Bauer passed backgrounds with the State of CA if he is even HALF of what you say? Please, you truck, I’d love to hear more b.s. from you, it is so entertaining. Ignorance is truly bliss for ya
Well Mills if Kenny is so bad, why didn’t you fire him when you were his superior?
OK James, concerning comment 10. This is where I can write definitively. I spent six years (age 15-21) working with a great small, honest corporation and on the side writing for newspapers. Then I spent nine long months working for a Fortune 500 corporation which I called corporate organized crime and identified the lawbreaking to my superiors. Then the opportunity was forced on me to work for myself for 37 years.
Those of us who were standing questioning governors at age 18 (amazingly the same governor now that I am 60), and assemblymen and congressmen and cabinent officials and assorted city officials, know the litany of government officials who say that any criticism by a former participant is invalid because they did not speak up definitively at the time. We also know that any government employee who truely confronts government coruption head on lasts less than the nine months I lasted in corporate organized crime.
Government attracts people who are eager to work for a “system”. When they see wrongs, they do everything they can to correct the wrongs within that system. Most eventually give into the corruption to some extent. Some break from the system or the system ejects them. This can take decades. Some may not even have full sanity when that happens.
Guys like me just sit back and wait for people like Sharon Gilbert, Kenny Holtz, Bill Postmus, Jim Erwin, and Bill Turner (FBI), to come forward. If you do not think they are totally stable, don’t worry, we know how to sort through that to learn the pertinent facts.
The derogatory comments from the status quo do help us, however, to define who is truely a threat to the status quo and also the particular shortcomings the detractors may have so that we may better sort through the information they give.
So thank you and you should really coment more often.
Mills can’t comment more often because he avoids facts and with blogs the way they are there are just too meny facts out there these days. He can only attempt to redirect by attacking Mr. Holtz’ career so many times in a post before even he probably knows he looks ridiculous.