Tuesday, March 13, 2018 – 11:30 a.m.
An Inland Empire political action committee has released information from a poll conducted in the San Bernardino County District Attorney race.
Business Leaders for Fair and Ethical Government PAC commissioned polling in the contest for San Bernardino County District Attorney, and the results aren’t what incumbent Mike Ramos would likely be expecting.
From Friday, March 2 to Monday, March 5, 2018, Probolsky Research conducted a live-interviewer telephone survey among 400-likely voters in San Bernardino County.
In the release of information from the poll, a surprisingly anemic 16.8-percent of voters believe the four-term district attorney should be re-elected. A large block, 34.8-percent of voters, say it’s time to give someone else a chance. The remaining 48.5-percent were either unsure or refused to say.
In what is known as an “Initial Ballot”. The majority of voters really aren’t sure who they would vote for.
Only 19.2-percent of respondents say they would vote for Ramos.
Ramos’ support among all voter demographics and geographical regions was not good.
But the weak support for Ramos plummets further after voters were given the first round of positive and negative informational statements, known as push-polling, regarding Ramos and Anderson. On a “First Informed Ballot Test”, Ramos’ support falls to just 9.5-percent.
In the beginning only 9.0-percent of voters said they would definitely vote for Ramos. But only 4.8-percent of voters stuck with Ramos after hearing his factual history.
The contest between Ramos and challenger Attorney/Law Professor Jason Anderson will be decided June 5.
We are predicting at least a thirty-point margin of victory for Anderson. You heard it here first!
Start packing, take your excess baggage with you.
Mikey has no money to fight this fight. He needs
another term to pay those punitive damages.
I would be interested to learn what the “positive informational statements” were that were given out about Mike Ramos.
Other than the fact that he is an incumbent and has some endorsements from some who want to preserve the status quo, I can’t imagine what could be said about him that is positive.
And if I were him I wouldn’t brag about the Neil Derry case; under scrutiny that case unfolds as a textbook example of the type of politically motivated prosecution that he is denying being involved in.
Bye bye Mary Ashley.
Where is the link to donate money against Ramos. The more the better! You
I personally was asked to donate to Ed O’Brien’s Campaign. O’Brien begged us to donate to his campaign. He begged us to ask our relatives and friends to donate…even $5 dollars a month to show he was capable of fundraising on his own. Clearly he was wrong. I assumed he was a man of his word and would at least pay the filing fee to place his name on the Ballot for SBDA. I want my donations back. Clearly, Mr. O’Brien was “testing” the waters to see if he had a chance…O’Brien has ZERO Credibility and he continues to trash the office that has paid for his indiscretions for years. O”Brien uses women to fight his battles. He is guilty of everything he accuses others of doing with the exception that he is significantly less credible.
@6 he drinks too much
@Boxer promoted him because she liked his NY energy. He’s from Boston.
I kid you not.
Administrator – I just re-read your article. The last sentence, “You heard it here first!”. Is Jamesmills writing for you?
James mills there is a tool.