Los Angeles has had several sites proposed for an NFL stadium over the years, yet the nation’s second-largest city is still without a team.
November 19, 2015
The clock is winding down on the likelihood of the NFL’s return to Los Angeles by the 2016 season, and the situation is as murky as ever.
St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke is proposing a stadium in Inglewood, and the San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders are backing a competing plan in Carson.
The NFL held special committee meetings in New York last week to discuss L.A., and the full ownership will convene in Dallas in two weeks for the league’s regular one-day December meetings, where L.A. will be a focus.
If a decision on the nation’s second-largest market isn’t made within the next three months, yet another postponement is a possibility.
Here we ask and answer some questions on where the situation stands:
Is the NFL going to be back in Los Angeles next season?
There’s a good possibility, but no one can say for sure — not any of the owners and not Commissioner Roger Goodell. We’re closer to its being a reality than at any time since the late 1990s, when L.A. and Houston were in the running for the 32nd franchise, but anyone who says they absolutely know what’s going to happen is lying either to you or themselves.
Would this be decided by a vote of the owners?
Any relocation requires a three-quarters majority approval from the 32 NFL owners. But in this case, the league would manage the outcome instead of pitting the two projects against each other for an up-or-down vote. The NFL doesn’t want one or two teams to emerge as losers and get sent back to markets they tried to leave. That means there would be lots of negotiations (and probably a grand bargain) before anything comes to a vote.
Could a team move to L.A. without league approval?
To read expanded article, click here.