By David Siders
Published: Saturday, Jan. 14, 2012 – 12:00 am | Page 3A

When former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger tried to repeal a state law requiring animal shelters to keep dogs and cats longer before euthanizing them, outrage from animal lovers was so overwhelming he was forced to drop the idea.

Eight years later, Gov. Jerry Brown is proposing to repeal provisions of the same law. But this time – owing to improved shelter conditions and to years of tough budget conditioning – hardly anyone has complained.

The shelter requirement, temporarily suspended in 2009, is one of about 30 local government mandates Brown is proposing to repeal in state budget legislation, greatly reducing the number of directives for which local agencies may claim reimbursement from the state.

The savings is not insignificant. The Democratic governor is counting on saving about $729 million by suspending or repealing various mandates, and about $100 million more by deferring payments the state already owes.

In all, the mandate repeals make up nearly a fifth of the spending cuts in Brown’s proposal. The repeal of the animal shelter mandate alone is expected to save the state more than $46 million next fiscal year.

In many cases, the mandates have been suspended for years, and in most cases – including at animal shelters, officials say – local agencies still provide the same services, anyway.

Among the mandates Brown is seeking to repeal are requirements that local agencies conduct autopsies on infants who die unexpectedly, take missing person reports and provide emergency workers portable masks and airway assemblies to use while administering CPR.

“Some of these things, to be honest with you, are so old that they don’t make sense in a modern environment,” said Jean Hurst, a lobbyist for the California State Association of Counties. “I mean, CPR masks? Who would send out their firefighters or cops without CPR masks?”

Temporarily suspending local mandates is a years-old budget tool. But Brown, who was governor before when voters first required the state in 1979 to reimburse local agencies for the cost of certain state-mandated programs, is proposing to permanently repeal more than in previous years.

The administration’s goal is to “change the overall structure to make it more efficient and get away from the current claiming process that’s time-intensive and costly for everyone to operate,” state Finance Director Ana Matosantos said at a California Chamber of Commerce luncheon Thursday.

Brown said in Elk Grove on Friday that local government “ought to have as much authority as possible.”

“Every time the state issues a mandate, then we’ve got to have some kind of a policeman, a bureaucrat, an enforcer, an auditor, somebody else who checks up on the rules,” he said. “And I would like to see more accountability at the local level, and then with the appropriate oversight by the state.”

He said, “So it’s a matter of balance, and I’m trying to rewrite an imbalance.”

To read entire story, click here.