Lower-than-forecast revenue means automatic reductions will likely kick in. A shorter K-12 school year could result.
By Anthony York and Nicholas Riccardi
Los Angeles Times
November 17, 2011
Reporting from Sacramento— Sluggish state revenue is likely to trigger a new round of spending cuts that could mean a shorter school year and millions of dollars slashed from public universities, child care programs and services for the disabled, the Legislative Analyst’s Office says.
California’s coffers will be $3.7 billion below what lawmakers and the governor assumed in the budget they crafted last summer, said Mac Taylor, the analyst whom legislators look to for nonpartisan financial advice. The new reductions were built into the spending plan, to kick in if state income fell short.
A final decision will be made next month, when Gov. Jerry Brown’s Department of Finance releases its own forecast for the rest of the fiscal year, which ends June 30. Taylor said the projections could still change enough to ward off some of the deepest cuts. But his announcement Wednesday was the first official confirmation that reductions are likely.
The grim news prompted outrage from education officials who have already sharply pared their budgets. But it was no surprise to economists who had criticized Brown for balancing the budget by anticipating an extra $4 billion in revenue after he failed to secure Republican support for a ballot measure to raise taxes.
“Short of aliens landing on the planet with a big bucket of cash,” said Christopher Thornberg, a founder of Beacon Economics, “there’s no way we’re going to make [Brown’s] revenue projections.”
If the economic picture does not improve in December, the new cuts would include a $1.4-billion reduction in public school funds that would even force state-provided student buses to be mothballed. Such severe cuts had Los Angeles schools Supt. John Deasy publicly contemplating defiance Wednesday.
“What comes to mind is we simply won’t do it,” he said in an interview.
At the urging of teachers unions, legislators barred districts from closing the money gap by laying off teachers. Rather, they would have to cut expenses elsewhere. The state gave them permission to trim up to a week from the school year if they agreed with their local teachers unions to do so.
Kevin Gordon, a lobbyist for several school districts, said he believes it would be almost impossible for local authorities to win permission from labor to curtail the academic year and the Legislature would have to revisit the issue.
“There will be a reshuffling of the deck entirely if it appears schools will have to shoulder the magnitude of cuts” that the Legislative Analyst’s Office projects, Gordon said.
In addition to reductions in K-12 education, the University of California and California State University systems would each lose $100 million. Fees at the state’s community colleges would increase by an additional $10 per unit.
Counties, already struggling to accommodate more inmates under Brown’s current budget, which shifts responsibility for some offenders from the state to local governments, would lose $72 million that pays for the housing of serious juvenile offenders.
To read entire story, click here.