Phil Willon, John Myers
May 10, 2016
U.S. Senate hopeful Kamala Harris found herself under attack Tuesday night during a fiery debate where she was accused of putting her political ambitions ahead of serving Californians as state Attorney General and pressed about why she hasn’t investigated police shootings.
Harris was put on defense almost immediately when former state Republican Party Chairman George “Duf” Sundheim, in his opening statement, accused her of siding “with her donors” over the state’s most vulnerable.
“Kamala is failing to keep us safe,” Sundheim said. “There is a 34% increase in violent crime in the state of California and a 24% increase in property crime, and that’s just within the last year.”
Harris initially appeared taken aback by Sundheim’s aggressive attacks, which continued throughout the hour-long debate.
She sharply defended her record and deflected the attacks by reciting her accomplishments as attorney general, saying she had been successful in going after the big banks that caused the mortgage crisis, protecting women’s reproductive rights and the rights of unaccompanied immigrant children.
“In the name of the people I have been proud to fight for California homeowners and bring $20 billion back to California,” Harris said at the outset. “I have been proud to fight on behalf of the people of California in fighting transnational criminal organizations.”
Tuesday’s debate was quite a change from the first debate in late April when Harris, the clear front-runner in the race to replace retiring Democrat Barbara Boxer in the Senate, emerged relatively unscathed after spending 90 minutes on stage with her top four Democratic and Republican political rivals.
The sharper tone this time around showed how much is at stake in the last of only two debates being held before California’s June 7 primary election, and underscored the intense competition for second place. Under the state’s top-two primary system, the two candidates who receive the most votes advance to the November general election, regardless of party. There are 34 candidates on the ballot.
An April Field poll had Harris receiving support from 27% of likely primary voters in California, compared with 14% for her top Democratic rival, Rep. Loretta Sanchez of Orange. The three top GOP candidates registered in the single digits: Ron Unz with 5%, Tom Del Beccaro with 4% and Sundheim with 2%. Close to half of those voters surveyed said they were undecided.
Sanchez, whose grasp on the second spot appears tenuous, at times appeared flustered during the debate.
When asked about her 2005 vote in favor of legislation that shielded the gun industry from liability for the criminal or negligent acts of gun owners, she gave a winding answer that ended with her saying her “F” rating from the National Rifle Assn. was proof of a strong record on gun control.
“My record is strong on protecting Americans with respect to gun violence,” she said. The law, she added, “didn’t give blanket immunity to the gun makers.”
Sundheim, who said gun control is best handled by the states, seized on the gun issue to launch another attack on Harris, citing a state auditor’s report that criticized her agency for delays in determining whether potentially dangerous people — those with a severe mental illness or criminal history — own guns in violation of state law.
Harris rejected the criticism, saying state officials have rounded up 10,000 guns. She said the program was “revived” under her leadership.
“Let’s not play around with real human lives,” she said.
To read expanded article, click here.