Wind turbines. (Getty Images)
By Neil Derry
Posted: 11/13/15 – 1:25 PM PST |
The state of California has embarked on a 25-year green power odyssey in an effort to reduce the amount of carbon we place into the atmosphere, all aimed at leading the world in an anti-climate change crusade for humanity.
Beginning in 2030, 50 percent of all electrical power produced for our regulated utilities will be mandated “renewable” energy. This definition under the current law includes energy from solar, wind and small hydroelectric facilities built, or to be built, over that time frame. It excludes residential solar installations and existing large hydroelectric projects such as energy produced from Hoover Dam.
While some of this new power will be “infill” development (smaller solar projects that may be placed in vacant or brown-field urban areas), most of it will be new development in areas of the state where sunshine and wind are most plentiful, our more remote inland desert regions including much of the Inland Empire.
The current mandate of 20 percent renewable energy scheduled to be met by 2020 (since changed to 33 percent) has almost been met, but it has come at a high price for consumers, an increase in electrical rates of 35 percent. California now has rates 40 percent higher than the national average.
There are a number of factors involved in the high cost of this renewable energy. The easiest factor for the public to understand is that since these projects are largely built in remote areas away from population centers, they require new transmission infrastructure to deliver the power to consumers. This new infrastructure is funded through increased electrical rates.
But there are other factors which most consumers are not aware of. While costs for solar and wind projects have decreased over the last decade thanks in part to heavy taxpayer subsidies, their costs remain significantly higher than traditional natural gas or coal-fired power plants. Sunshine and wind are free, but the technology needed to collect that energy is very expensive. It requires significantly more property to build, and whether that property is purchased or leased, land is not cheap in California.
To read expanded column, click here.