ObamaCare

The court to rule on on whether low- and middle-income Americans may receive subsidies in two-thirds of the states to make insurance more affordable. (Associated Press)

Court ot rule on healthcare law again
By David G. Savage
November 7, 2014

The Supreme Court will decide the fate of President Obama’s healthcare law yet again, this time ruling on whether low- and middle-income Americans may receive subsidies in two-thirds of the states to make insurance more affordable.

Currently, about 5 million Americans have subsidized insurance they bought through a healthcare exchange, or online marketplace, run by the federal government.

The conservative group that has brought the case now before the high court argues that such an arrangement is illegal. They maintain that the Affordable Care Act, as written, allows the government to subsidize health insurance only in the states that have set up their own insurance exchanges.

Thirty-six states have not set up their own exchanges, relying instead on the marketplace run by the federal government. If the challenge to the law succeeds, residents of those states would be unable to obtain subsidies unless the states involved change their positions.

Administration lawyers and the Democratic lawmakers who sponsored the law have called the argument absurd. They say the law intended to provide insurance subsidies nationwide, regardless of whether it was bought through a federal or state exchange.

The language in the law saying subsidies may be paid through an “exchange established by the state” needs to be read in the context of the entire statute, they argue.

A federal appeals court based in Virginia agreed with the administration’s position, but now the high court has decided to review that ruling, putting a central element of the law back into jeopardy.

Two years ago, the high court by a 5-4 vote upheld the Affordable Care Act as constitutional. The new case will determine whether the law can work as its sponsors intended.

Friday’s announcement that the court would consider the case came as a surprise. Many legal experts had predicted that the justices would take no action for now because a challenge to the insurance subsides is still pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

To read entire story, click here.