Dan Morain
By Dan Morain
dmorain@sacbee.com
Published: Sunday, Dec. 2, 2012 – 12:00 am | Page 1E
Joe Baca never saw it coming, and neither did Gloria Negrete McLeod.
But as state Sen. Negrete McLeod replaces Baca in Congress, the dueling San Bernardino County Democrats witnessed first hand the beginnings of a change in gun politics, courtesy of billionaire New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
No doubt the strongest gun control advocate on Forbes’ list of the fabulously rich, Bloomberg seized an opportunity to unseat Baca, a pro-gun Democrat, by spending $3.3 million on television and mail attacks. Given his estimated $25 billion fortune, $3.3 million is couch cushion change. But it was three times the sum Baca and Negrete McLeod raised between them. By homing in on a loyal National Rifle Association politician, Bloomberg altered a long-standing element of American politics.
Time was, a politician like Baca could cast pro-gun votes, receive NRA support and not worry about an attack from any moneyed interest that promoted gun control. No such group existed, at least not on the order of the NRA.
Until, that is, Bloomberg came along. He spent $8.1 million through his Independence USA political action committee in his first serious foray into the electoral politics of guns, and candidates he backed won in three of the six races where Independence USA played.
“It sends a message: you can lose your seat by voting against prudent gun legislation,” said New York Deputy Mayor Howard Wolfson, the strategist who led Bloomberg’s campaign. “Hopefully, members will think twice before taking these votes. They can’t just vote the NRA’s way and assume they won’t hear about it.”
The NRA spent more than $17 million on this year’s campaigns. It failed in its top priority, unseating President Barack Obama, a $12 million effort, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.
The NRA didn’t fare well in U.S. Senate races, either, spending six-figure sums in Indiana, Wisconsin, Ohio, Virginia, Florida, Maine, Missouri and Arizona, winning only in Arizona.
It skipped Baca’s race, a telling omission. If any candidate warranted NRA support, Baca was that man. In his 20 years in Sacramento and in Washington, Baca rarely if ever wavered from National Rifle Association orthodoxy. There were times when he was the only Democrat who sided with the NRA.
To read entire story, click here.

There is much more to this story. I heard Working Joe pissed off Mayor B over some other issue.
#1
You are correct there is WAY much more to this story. I do not know what other issues you speak of, that Bloomberg has with Baca, but they are of no significance in terms of the election outcome HERE …
Loretta Sanchez and many many Democrats have had many many “issues”
and deep disgust for Baca and sons for many many years and they, BACA’S OWN PARTY, could not help us purge them from our soil in the I.E.!
I have very credible information, and have eye witnessed myself, that Baca is on a mission to see WHAT or WHO threw this whole election off it’s course – for BOTH, him and his son.
Baca understands the whole NRA and Bloomberg money affect, BUT he is
also a veteran politician and KNOWS that something went HORRIBLY wrong BACK HOME..BUT WHAT…
BACA SENIOR IS BAFFLED…
He felt he or, at the very least, his “ALREADY SEATED RIALTO COUNCILMAN SON” should have had this election without a problem.