52% 45%
Sunday, October 21, 2012 – 02:00 p.m.
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney’s lead over President Barack Obama as moved back to 7-points in the latest update to the Gallup 7-Day Tracking Poll of 2,700 likely voters.
The poll now takes into account four days of post-debate results.
Romney holding firm is not a good sign for the incumbent President, with many battleground states moving slowly towards Romney.
Filed under: Barack Obama, Campaigns, Democrats, Elections, Politics, Polls, Republicans, U.S. Government
Whose mug is pictured on th right? Looks kinda mean and ornery.
The guy looks smug and conceited. Just like you would expect from a dishonest fellow who would say anything to get elected. Thank God the voters see through his phoniness.
Hope we send Barrack Hussein back to Kenya.
It’s a good thing non of you believe the polls, this way noone will be too overwhelmed when Romney gets body slammed and sent packing in November.
FYI–my comments were directed Mittens, not Obama. The President is a great man, and he will be re-elected. Even the Salt Lake City newspaper
endorsed Obama.
Obama the affirmative action prez will lose. Too bad library losers. Get a life, get off the dole.
#6……I have just one word for you, ROMNESIA! HA HA HA HA . Get your life rafts back out because your ship is leaking again.
Why does the anti-government crowd support Romney when he says he opposes abortion? Isn’t this position contrary to the right of the individual to make decisions for themselves? If Romney would do this to a woman, what makes you guys think he won’t intrude into your lives too? He does want contraception so what about having the government pay for Viagra? Why the big fight against contraception but not the government paying for Viagra?
Romney cares about big business not you 47% ers. WIse up, and stop drinking the right wing kool aid
Sorry for typing error: he doesn’t want contraception
CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG (under Romney?)
Marie, abortion is murder (killing a baby). That trumps individual rights. It’s not “anti-government.” That would be anarchy. It’s limited government. Constitutionally limited government. And the argument isn’t whether contraception is allowed, but whether the government can force someone to provide or pay for another person’s contraception against their beliefs (or pay for it for any reason). I’m not part of the 47%. I pay federal income taxes. I think you’re drinking the left-wing kool aid.
http://www.sbsun.com/opinions/ci_21828391/opinion-paul-krugman-secret-u-s-s-non
Marie….Here’s an excellent article about the dangers of a president Romney.
http://www.sbsun.com/opinions/ci_21828391/opinion-paul-krugman-secret-u-s-s-non
Marie….Here is an article about the dangers of a president Romney.
Let’s see how all you fellows react when the goverment wants to stick a probe down your penis. Romney et al want a woman to have probe up her vagina before she gets an abortion. I say keep the government out of our personal lives. Romney is a hypocrite. He wants government out of our lives unless it benefits him and his viewpoint.
On another note, if we are going to stop women from having contraception, lets stop insurance companies paying for Viagra. Of course, the Moromon Church, the Catholic church and the evangelicals will probably be handing Viagra out from the pulpit.
Romney’s performance in the foreign policy debate was pitiful. He looks lost.