Devereaux

Sunday, August 5, 2012 – 10:30 a.m.

One has to hand it to San Bernardino County Chief Executive Officer Greg Devereaux.

The man single-handedly tubed county pension reform last week.

A seemingly easy task to accomplish.

The losers in this debacle? The county supervisors themselves.

Even some close Devereaux supporters, who know him well, are speechless at how the man has tactically placed the entire board of supervisors in the cross-hairs of the unions and the public.

Those same supporters aren’t really thrilled with the county’s dysfunctional government either.

But after all it really doesn’t affect Mr. Devereaux.

Does it?

Devereaux has a pretty-much iron clad, even though likely legally impermissible, contract giving him full reign for a five-year period ending in early 2015.

Under his employment agreement Devereaux can only be terminated by a four-fifths vote.

Nevertheless, Devereaux has accomplished something none of his predecessors ever could have, even if they wanted to.

That being, screw over the board of supervisors under the guise of I’m looking out for you.

It was Devereaux and company that engaged in disingenuous bargaining that spurred heavily-funded county unions to successfully place a measure on the November ballot that, if passed, will cut county supervisor compensation to a fraction of what it is now, and also attempt to limit their staff size.

It’s widely agreed the pay cut to the elected officials, if it passes, will stand. But the component limiting staff size likely will not pass constitutional muster.

According to well-placed sources, Devereaux is elated with the idea of a part-time board of supervisors with potentially lesser staff than he’s already forced on them. The reason is Devereaux’s experience has been with part-time city councils, and a full-time board of supervisors has been a pain in the ass and a distraction.

The goal here? More power!

WINNER: Devereaux LOSER: Board of Supervisors

Then we have the Devereaux-formulated county answer to defeating the aforementioned union-backed compensation measure.

A competing charter amendment that does absolutely nothing but remove Los Angeles County from the list of comparison counties currently used to set Board of Supervisors pay.

A measure that could have been written by a five-year old with a crayon.

Compare the Devereaux-proposed measure to the wording and appeal of the union-backed measure and it’s not even close.

To put it bluntly. The county measure is a loser out of the gate regardless of campaigning.

However, one can expect the County Counsel’s Office to play with the ballot titling.

WINNER: Devereaux LOSER: Board of Supervisors

Then we have last weeks pension reform fiasco.

There’s no argument the San Bernardino County pension system needs restructuring.

But it seems only if it’s the Devereaux way.

County Supervisors Janice Rutherford and Neil Derry, not Devereaux, brought forward two proposals, which would bring significant balance to the system and savings to the county.

When the ideas began to bloom, Devereaux, even while on vacation, worked to undermine both measures.

He didn’t want any of this going on.

Why? It would take power away from him and place it with the voters.

Devereaux and staff worked to convince supervisors they had no ability to legally “attempt” to meet and confer with unions.

One supervisor was even pressured into not attending an editorial board at a local newspaper.

Explanations Devereaux and company gave to the board of supervisors, if taken seriously, would mean the county, or the residents of Jupiter for that matter, could never ever place any reform measure on the ballot, even though a well-qualified Northern California law firm, specializing in government, disagreed.

A second reason Devereaux gave for not pursuing pension reform? It could blow-up a tentative agreement between the county and the Safety Employees Benefit Association (SEBA).

The only problem? The agreement at hand, which is a winner for the union, secures virtually nothing of the actual savings Devereaux told the board of supervisors the county needed to obtain. Not even close.

Plus, any contractual agreement can be changed by future boards, unlike a voter-approved charter amendment.

But, the county wants the biggest chunk of money from its largest union, the San Bernardino Public Employees Association (SBPEA).

Somehow Devereaux cajoled county supervisors into believing a deal could be done with SBPEA and that any charter amendment on pension reform would kill that possibility as well.

Late this week SBPEA, a group which has already given significant contract concessions, gave the county the finger to that idea even after the two pension reform proposals were killed.

So now San Bernardino County is the only jurisdiction in the state to propose pension reform and not go through with it.

WINNER: Devereaux LOSER: Board of Supervisors

It’s shrewdness and gamesmanship at its finest.