Supervisors Neil Derry left, and Janice Rutherford right.
Joe Nelson, Staff Writer
Posted: 07/18/2012 06:37:55 PM PDT
San Bernardino County Supervisor Neil Derry is proposing a pension-reform measure for the November ballot that would raise the retirement age for new county employees and reduce the amount they earn annually toward their pension benefits.
Derry said Wednesday he will introduce his proposal to the Board of Supervisors on July 31. The board must approve it by Aug. 9 to get it on the ballot.
The proposal also would require that all employees pick up the roughly 7 percent share of what the county pays into their pensions, which equates to $61 million for the 2012-13 fiscal year alone, Derry said.
“The goal is to stabilize the pension fund and reduce the liability to the taxpayers for both the benefit of taxpayers as well as our pensioners,” Derry said. “Our employees will benefit by ensuring that the pension is solvent in future years, and the taxpayers also benefit by that solvency because they are on the hook if the pension plan fails in coming decades.”
Pension costs in the county have grown from 3.1 percent of total expenditures in 1999 to 9.5 percent in 2011. In 1999, the county contributed $43.8 million to its retirement pension fund. In 2011, the total was $232.3 million.
The measure also aims to thwart pension spiking by averaging the annual compensation over an employee’s final three years on the job instead of their single highest-paid year.
If the board and taxpayers approve the measure, the county would amend its retirement formula for public-safety employees from 3 percent at age 50 to 2 percent. In other words, once the employee becomes eligible for retirement at age 50, the annual pension benefit would be based on 2 percent of the average of the three highest paid years on the job, multiplied by the number of years on the job.
For general employees, the retirement formula would change from 2 percent at age 55 to 2 percent at 62.
The new retirement formulas would apply to new employees if taxpayers approve the measure in November and union contracts are renegotiated.
Derry said the changes will save the county hundreds of millions of dollars in the long run.
To read entire story, click here.


Shut your filthy mouth you Lewis pig.
Thank you Derry and Rutherford, good to see common-sense and cooperation.
(Anonymous #1,
I believe you are lost, you’re insult does not apply to this article.)
Give it up Derry, you’re still not going to be re-elected in November.
Neil Derry is not a quitter.
“If you are going through hell, keep going.”
- Winston Churchill
DERRY IS A MARINE; HONOR, DUTY, COURAGE, AND COMMITMENT ARE WHAT DERRY IS MADE OF!
Anonymous #4:
Don’t forget model probationer for his arrest. He’s still on probation isn’t he?
Now a few months to the election he’s got a plan. Wow. Did he just realize this was a problem? Or was he just too busy fighting off his own legal troubles to notice? Maybe he thought if he sang enough Sinatra
it wouldn’t matter.
Repairman:
You’re regressing. A while back you finally admitted that Neil Derry was never arrested. Now, in Comment #4, you are once again claiming that he was arrested. Mike Ramos would be proud.
Sorry, Comment #5
Observer of Facts :
Well your right. I should have said he was smart enough to turn himself in to the proper authorities instead of being arrested. Personally I think your splitting hairs but O.K. he still had to show up. And he’s still on probation isn’t he?
Repairman:
I disagree; there is a big difference between getting arrested and showing up. Jeff Burum’s $10 million bail was reduced to $0 due to his history of showing up. Do you think it would have been reduced if they had to go out and arrest him?
The local media has a long history of mischaracterizing events, and I believe that a more informed decision can be reached when the facts are observed.
For example, for over a year The Sun and Daily Bulletin articles about The Colonies settlement tried to deceive readers into thinking that the matter had not gone to trial.
More recently, in today’s article about a lawsuit against Cal Trans, they are mischaractericizing a jury verdict as a “Multi Million dollar civil settlement.”
As Sgt. Joe Friday once said: “All we want are the facts.”
Observer of Facts:
What would have happened if he hadn’t shown up? If he would just said no I’m not coming? How do you end up on probation with out being arrested?
Did he get finger printed? did he get a mug shot? And what has jeff burum or any of the so called fact’s you mentioned have to do with what derry did?
Derry’s still on probation isn’t he?
Repairman,
you are talking to the hand, you made your point. SO WHAT, we know the truth behind your annoying repeated statement about Derry’s probation…
Our eyes on his present leadership abilities and solutions…get out of his way, SBC has too much to lose, we are on thin ice…
WE NEED NEIL DERRY UP FRONT AND CENTER!
ANON#12…..Repairman repeats his point because the majority of you are forgetful, the rest of you are just plain corrupt. Derry has no plan beyond November, but that’s OK because he will not be re-elected. The public sees him for the crook that he is. BTW, his service does not give him license to be a slimy politician, but it does put him under obligation to uphold his fiduciary duty to the public, a duty which he failed at. What a dishonor as a Marine!
Anonymous #13:
With all due respect, you would have to be nearly incoherent to not have heard your and “Repairman’s” point loud and clear: Neil Derry is a “crook.”
This clearly is and will continue to be the main focus of James Ramos campaign, and he can continue to avoid having to answer rudimentary questions about County government, or explaining how he is qualified to be a County Supervisor.
Red Anon… you state “What a dishonor as a Marine!”
PLEASE DO NOT GO THERE!
DON’T DRAG THE NAME OF THE “MARINES” INTO A NEGATIVE POLITICAL FIGHT IF YOU ARE GOING TO LIE ABOUT THE MAN WHO WORE THAT UNIFORM!
NOW MOVE ON.