Money & Politics | Daily Report
March 23, 2012 | Will Evans
Wealthy Californians are keeping the money flowing to super political action committees, even as some state lawmakers want to turn off the faucet.
Super PACs on the left and right drew hefty contributions last month from the rich and famous – such as controversial comedian Bill Maher and GOP mega-donor Jerry Perenchio – as well as from the merely rich.
Meanwhile, state legislators are pushing bills to curb the proliferation of unlimited money in politics.
The California Assembly yesterday approved a resolution urging Congress to overturn the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The split decision helped give rise to super PACs by allowing unlimited contributions from corporations and unions to attack or support politicians, as long as the committees don’t coordinate with candidates. The California bill, AJR 22, is part of a campaign to pass such resolutions around the country.
A trio of Assembly Democrats introduced another bill this week in an effort to go beyond a purely symbolic resolution. AJR 32 seeks to use a constitutional process whereby two-thirds of state legislatures can force Congress to call a constitutional convention. It calls for a constitutional amendment to declare that money does not equal speech, which would reverse decades of Supreme Court precedent.
“We wanted to do something that actually has effect, that would have the force of law and would be binding on Congress if 33 other states pass resolutions,” said Assemblyman Mike Gatto, D-Burbank. “If you equate speech 100 percent to money, then what you’re really saying is someone with no money has no speech rights, and that can’t be right.”
The strategy pursued by Gatto’s bill has never succeeded before and probably has no chance, said John Samples, director of the Center for Representative Government at the Cato Institute. Even if it did work, a constitutional convention could lead to a vastly different amendment than what was originally intended, Samples said.
The notion that money shouldn’t equal speech is popular, but could open a Pandora’s box of government regulations, he said. “It would be a mistake because essentially what you’re doing is giving Congress plenary power over the regulation of speech,” he said.
Until then, though, the floodgates are open.
Maher made a splash in February with a $1 million contribution to Priorities USA Action, a pro-Barack Obama super PAC, and then drew flak [PDF] from conservatives who compared his controversial commentary with that of conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh.
California’s other big liberal donor last month was not so famous: Kareem Ahmed of Rancho Cucamonga, gave the super PAC $500,000. Ahmed, CEO of Landmark Medical Management, said in a statement that he wants to do everything he can to ensure Obama’s re-election and battle conservative attack ads.
“President Obama is fighting to help middle class families during tough economic times, to transition our nation to a clean energy future, to fight to keep improving our health care – the list goes on and on,” he wrote. “Priorities USA Action has the President’s back, and I’m proud to have theirs.”
To read entire story, click here.