Republican activists turn in enough signatures to put on the ballot a measure that would overturn some new voting districts. But the signatures may not be verified in time to affect next year’s elections.

By Jean Merl, Los Angeles Times
November 25, 2011

Republican activists trying to overturn some new voting districts cleared a significant hurdle toward putting the issue on the ballot by turning in petitions bearing hundreds of thousands of signatures.

But the next step — verification of those names by county elections officials — could take long enough to stymie the proponents’ goal of getting new state Senate districts drawn by the state Supreme Court in time for next year’s elections.

Secretary of State Debra Bowen has said that vetting all the signatures could take until mid-March, after the Feb. 23 deadline for some candidates to file for the June primary. The timing could mean that the maps drawn by the California Citizens Redistricting Commission would be used until voters could weigh in on the November ballot.

The referendum would allow voters the final word on the Senate maps. Dave Gilliard, a consultant who oversaw the $2.5-million signature drive for a group called Fairness and Accountability in Redistricting (FAIR), said the activists believe the state’s high court could act in time for the June elections. He said FAIR’s attorneys believe current redistricting law gives the court the authority to create new maps once signed petitions for the referendum have been filed.

“We believe we have put in enough signatures to put the commission’s lines on hold and there will be new lines in June and November,” Gilliard said this week.

Attorneys for the redistricting commission have refuted that interpretation, arguing that only the qualification of a referendum for the ballot counts in prompting the state high court to act.

To read entire story, click here.