BY DUANE W. GANG, JEFF HORSEMAN
AND JOHN F. HILLSTAFF WRITERS
Published: 07 October 2011 12:34 PM
Calling it a “big-money business,” California’s four U.S. attorneys announced a major crackdown Friday targeting the sale, cultivation and distribution of medical marijuana — including operations in Wildomar.
The federal prosecutors said the state’s medical marijuana laws never were intended to shield large-scale growing operations and retail stores that sell the drug.
The U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles filed a civil forfeiture lawsuit against the property owners of the Wildomar Patients Compassionate Group. In addition, the office sent letters to all known marijuana stores in Wildomar, Murrieta and Temecula warning that their operations are in violation of federal law. Similar letters went out to operators in Upland, Montclair and Chino in San Bernardino County.
The letters went to the owners of the buildings and stores themselves, and warned that they have two weeks to “take the necessary steps to discontinue the sale and/or distribution of marijuana.”
“It is important to note that for-profit, commercial marijuana operations are illegal not only under federal law, but also under California law,” U.S. Attorney André Birotte Jr., who has jurisdiction for the Inland region, said at a Sacramento news conference.
“While California law permits collective cultivation of marijuana in limited circumstances, it does not allow commercial distribution through the storefront model we see across California,” he said.
Although California voters in 1996 legalized marijuana for medical uses, growing and using the drug has long been illegal under federal law.
The moves by federal authorities this week include criminal and civil actions against medical marijuana operations and the property owners who rent to them. Federal authorities are seeking to seize property and shut down their stores.
Prosecutors said they are working with the Internal Revenue Service to seize bank accounts with rent money from medical marijuana stores.
Local officials throughout the region, many of whom sought federal assistance, hailed the federal government’s decision to step into the long-running debate over whether to allow the sale of marijuana.
“It’s about time the federal government takes action,” Temecula Mayor Ron Roberts said. “It’s a federal law. Certainly I’m not going to say, ‘Don’t come in.’”
The city of Wildomar has zoning laws prohibiting marijuana dispensaries and has spent more than $50,000 trying to close down the Wildomar Patients Compassionate Group.
Wildomar Mayor Marsha Swanson also welcomed the federal government’s involvement.
“That’s money in our pocket that we don’t have,” she said of the money the city has spent so far.
But medical marijuana activists blasted the announcement by the four U.S. attorneys, particularly at a time when large numbers of Californians support the state’s medical marijuana laws.
Inland medical marijuana activist Lanny Swerdlow said Friday’s announcement was an effort by the Obama administration to pander to law enforcement officials who oppose medical marijuana because they believe it would lead to full legalization.
Crackdown on medical marijuana
“In exchange for their endorsement in 2012, Barack Obama has unleashed the Department of Justice attack dogs on medical marijuana patients and providers,” Swerdlow said.
Robin Sax, an attorney for Cooperative Patients’ Services of Temecula, said the business should not be penalized for following the exact letter of California’s laws. It’s unclear whether the cooperative will receive a warning letter.
To read entire story, click here.

Our President is a televised conference refereed to this as a means to stop mom and pop dispensary’s out of business. Smart move Mr. President! You continue to state how your closing down mom and pop businesses. Maybe a better issue for you to fight is the drug deals and cartels? Just food for thought.
Interested observer: No I am not if it is done legally! I was making a point that our President actually made that comment on a televised conference where millions were tuned in and watching. Obama referred to the dispensaries as mom and pop businesses. I also think it’s funny how he says he’s for small businesses how ever he continues to be an big instrument in closing them down. I personally think if they legalized it and taxed it then it would cut our deficit down some and take some of the tax burden off of the broke Americans that can’t make ends meet on a day to day basis.
Traci obviously doesnt have a clue about what she is talking about. “for profit” MJ dispensaries violate Ca law. Only collectives and cooperatives can provide MJ to qualified persons, not for profit. What has been happenning is that organized criminals and others open up these dispensaries and fill MJ scrips done by doper doctors at $200 each. Its nothing more than legalized drug dealing. Unfortunately, it violates both federal and state law. Too Bad dopers!
@Traci – Why are you calling me out? I didn’t even comment on this article.
tracyisanidiot: Your the idiot to get your facts straight it is legal in California it is illegal for the federal government! Get real the only ones that are trying to follow the law is the registered ones not the drug dealers. Your not going to stop drug deals so why not try to get some revenue off of it? People kill themselves every day and no one is going to stop that. Nor is anyone going to stop the drug deals by criminals either. Look at Mr. Murry in Micheal Jackson’s trail and tell me your logic is on the head? SO it’s ok for Doctors to overdose patients and give unneeded medication to make money and he/she is legally ok? How is he any different than a drug dealer and he is looking at what four years? He wasn’t even a licensed Cardiologist that almost killed other people. You have a very strange idea of what “for profit” actually means.
Interested Observer: Where did your post from earlier today go? You asked if she was for or against mom and pop dispensaries. I copied the posts from earlier so I know for a fact it was there. So where did that post go?
Administrator: Is there a problem with the posts from earlier today? You are normally pretty good at keeping all comments posted as they come in. This is a bit untypical that this has happened? Now I’m asking two things here: One did Interested Observer actually make the post earlier and for some strange reason it’s not showing or:
Two: You are taking your blog to the same place as other local blogs have already gone?
I have a very hard time believing that you would cause undue credibility to a person that does not deserve it. As for what ever reason she has come to your defense on several occasions now while others have spit nails at you and other named indicted.
Anonymous/BillyJackAttack, etc….:
We’ll try this one more time. Knock off holding conversations with yourself and using the posting names of others and you can continue. Otherwise you’re history. I seriously doubt you have unlimited IP Addresses to block.
It’s not pleasant is it?
Administrator
InlandPolitics.com
@Annon – I did not post earlier although some jerkwad was posting all over the blog using my name and based on the last post by the admin it appears he is aware of who did what and took steps to remove all the posts that were NOT made by me but by the imposter.
Hi! Im from NUTBLOG.COM. From what I read here you all belong over there with the nuts at NUTBLOG.COM. If its idiots and kooks and other various assorted nuts you are looking for you are at the wrong place! You belong with the Chief of Nuts at NUTBLOG! Join us now.