Sandra Emerson, Staff Writer
Created: 08/27/2011 07:09:40 AM PDT
UPLAND – The 11 candidates running for City Council have two days left to sway any last minute or undecided voters.
As of Friday, a little more than 8,600 of the 36,000 ballots sent out to residents have been returned to the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters, which means there may still be an opportunity for candidates to win last-minute votes.
The deadline for the all mail election is Tuesday.
There should be a large amount of ballots heading to the registrar during the last days of the election, said Doug Johnson, a research fellow with Claremont McKenna College’s Rose Institute.
“Usually there’s a fairly big surge the final weekend and there will probably be a lot of people dropping their ballots off on Tuesday, those who procrastinate and wait until the last minute which everyone tends to do,” Johnson said.
But the turnout so far is actually pretty good, he said.
“Usually (elections) turn out between 20 and 25 percent,” Johnson said. “Since they’ve hit that number even before the final rush they’re doing a little better than average.”
Although the election is winding down, voters can still expect to see candidates out in public, hear from candidates over the phone or even correspond through e-mail.
Sam Fittante, retired owner of a lawn maintenance company, said he is still running into residents who have not voted yet.
“I’m not actually asking them to vote for me. I’m handing them my cards and saying, “Please vote’,” Fittante said. “I’m still optimistic that I have a slim chance.”
Debbie Stone, funeral director at Stone Funeral Home in Upland, said she, too, is still hearing from undecided voters.
“I’m getting a lot of questions through my email account and calls where people are calling that are undecided and asking different questions,” Stone said. “We’re also pursuing some non-traditional avenues, and they actually seem to be a very good source, so we’ll see I guess.”
Elaine Courey, a Bonita Unified School District teacher, is making sure her family, friends, neighbors and co-workers do not forget to vote.
“I keep bugging them and asking them, `Have you voted? Have you voted?’ ” she said.
Dan Morgan, the city treasurer, is relying on the phone lines to get the word out.
“At this point, phone calling is the thing that will probably have the most use,” he said. “I’m having fun communicating with people.”
Ladan Bezanson, a learning coordinator for Montclair, will be speaking with some of the city’s shoppers over the weekend.
“I’m going near shopping centers and talking with people and passing out fliers,” she said. “I’ve been hitting public events and also been distributing fliers throughout neighborhoods. This is my last push here.”
Voters may see Maureen Sundstrom, an attorney, at the grocery store or her children’s school wearing her campaign shirt.
“One purpose is they can identify me and know who I am. They can ask me questions and talk to me, which has worked,” Sundstrom said. “It has also kind of allowed people to see who I am at the grocery store, who I am at my kids’ school – what kind of person I am and get to know me.”
To read entire story, click here.

I found this on another blog. I see Chief Antonucci is up to his same ways as in California City. He and his “buddies” were kicked out of California City, Upland needs to do the same!
How can a Fire Chief write himself a $78,163 “contract for services”, while he is still Fire Chief? Fire Chief Mike Antonucci is not due to retire until the end of September, but the Upland City Council approved a $78,163 “contract for services” for Fire Chief Michael Antonucci, before his retirement. The funds for this “contract for services” came from, is city funds that Fire Chief Michael Antonucci is directly in charge of. Is it legal for a Fire Chief in charge of city funds to use those funds (that he is in charge of) in-order to write himself a “contract for services”? Unethical? Illegal? He is in charge of the city funds used to pay for his “contract for services”.
Please investigate the below information.
Question for the people of Upland. How is it your Fire Chief can be awarded a contract for $78,163 before he has even retired from the City?
Aren’t you suppose to retire, collect your pension benefits and be done and move on?
Look at this one people. The Upland Fire Chief has been awarded a “contract for services” for $78,163 before he has even retired!
Doesn’t even sound legal being awarded a contract of $78 thousand dollars doing the same job after you retire, before you even retire.
And the contract monies comes out of the funds of the Fire Department that the Fire Chief is in charge of!
No wonder the City of Upland is in the sad position they are in!
Council Agenda 8/13/2011
“On Item #5, Staff Report dated August 13, 2011. Table #2 – “City of Upland Detailed Revenue and Appropriation Ammendments”. Page 11 of 11. Why was item 101-400-35xx-42xx Fire Chief Contract – $78,163 not addressed within the rest of the Staff report as the other positions were? Was this item hidden for approval? Why another $78,163 for the Fire Chief? Why was this item or position not addressed within the Staff Report? Once again, why was this item hidden for approval?”
Is this illegal or just non-ethical? No matter, it is wrong!
@PastCaliforniaCityFF – I’d like to know what Antonucci did to get kicked out of California City? Please shed some light.