In fact the skepticism over the theories of global warming, based solely on computer models and not consistent ice core data, geological examination, or evidence from any other field of scientific study, has produced embarrassing moments for the global warming zealots (The US Congress could start an investigation into leaked emails which suggest climate change statistics have been consistently manipulated to make the case for anthropogenic global warming more credible.)

Brad is right on, albeit his motivations are economic, about the absurdity of California’s Eco-legislation movement. You don’t just say, “sorry that energy source is bad for the planet, we need to stop, and hopefully that will spur on somebody to find a new energy source.”

You spur on responsible change by legislating economic policies that spur on investment in and development of cost effective mechanisms that can replace fossil fuel vehicles and energy sources. By the way, I feel it is just months before the ecopreachers try to legislate CO2 production by regulating my breathing.

I think it’s the other way around, Brad wrote: I’d say a majority of the proponents of global warming theory, without being insulted, treated like you’re some kind of Neanderthal. People roll their eyes, but the people I know, I’d say almost half of them aren’t totally convinced.”

Seems that if you are a proponent for responsible climate change laws in this county, you’re the environmental Neanderthal.