<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: SacBee: Schwarzenegger says no tax hikes, but insurance charge looks like one</title> <atom:link href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2010/01/18/sacbee-schwarzenegger-says-no-tax-hikes-but-insurance-charge-looks-like-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2010/01/18/sacbee-schwarzenegger-says-no-tax-hikes-but-insurance-charge-looks-like-one/</link> <description>Politics, Government and Business in Southern California&#039;s Inland Empire</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Unwilling...</title><link>http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2010/01/18/sacbee-schwarzenegger-says-no-tax-hikes-but-insurance-charge-looks-like-one/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link> <dc:creator>Unwilling...</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:23:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/?p=1634#comment-158</guid> <description>Uh, excuse me, but people that live in non-fire prone areas (flatlanders as there more commonly called by those &quot;rugged individualists&quot; that live in the mountain areas)have to pay for the choice of a few isolationist nutballs who wish to live next to kindling? Are we ever going to stop allowing Sacramento from the infringement of our personal freedoms? How about the people that live in the mountains pay extra for the fire services they over-utilize? This is just a ploy to float an overinflated fire budget that has long been needing a severe overhaul. Write your Representative about this nonsense.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, excuse me, but people that live in non-fire prone areas (flatlanders as there more commonly called by those &#8220;rugged individualists&#8221; that live in the mountain areas)have to pay for the choice of a few isolationist nutballs who wish to live next to kindling? Are we ever going to stop allowing Sacramento from the infringement of our personal freedoms? How about the people that live in the mountains pay extra for the fire services they over-utilize? This is just a ploy to float an overinflated fire budget that has long been needing a severe overhaul. Write your Representative about this nonsense.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
