<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: SBSun: Report clears DA in employee complaint</title> <atom:link href="http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2010/01/16/sbsun-report-clears-da-in-employee-complaint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2010/01/16/sbsun-report-clears-da-in-employee-complaint/</link> <description>Politics, Government and Business in Southern California&#039;s Inland Empire</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: RC Voter</title><link>http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2010/01/16/sbsun-report-clears-da-in-employee-complaint/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link> <dc:creator>RC Voter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:42:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/?p=1565#comment-143</guid> <description>If there wasn&#039;t any affair as Ramos has stated repeatedly, then how could the report find that &quot;it&quot; was consensual?  What was consensual?  They both consented to having coffee.  They both consented to sharing a piece of pie or whatever? They both consented to a good screw?  How is a finding that he was screwing a subordinate characterized as vindication?  What&#039;s up with this county?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there wasn&#8217;t any affair as Ramos has stated repeatedly, then how could the report find that &#8220;it&#8221; was consensual?  What was consensual?  They both consented to having coffee.  They both consented to sharing a piece of pie or whatever? They both consented to a good screw?  How is a finding that he was screwing a subordinate characterized as vindication?  What&#8217;s up with this county?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Little Stevie Wonder</title><link>http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2010/01/16/sbsun-report-clears-da-in-employee-complaint/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link> <dc:creator>Little Stevie Wonder</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:11:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/?p=1565#comment-141</guid> <description>This is the legal fraud &quot;game&quot; and is the reason why lawyers always just say; &quot;Show me the money&quot; for saying whatever the client, in this case the County government and its new leader Devilreaux, wants them to say.  The Devil is in the details.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the legal fraud &#8220;game&#8221; and is the reason why lawyers always just say; &#8220;Show me the money&#8221; for saying whatever the client, in this case the County government and its new leader Devilreaux, wants them to say.  The Devil is in the details.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AntiCorruptionUnit</title><link>http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/2010/01/16/sbsun-report-clears-da-in-employee-complaint/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link> <dc:creator>AntiCorruptionUnit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:21:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://inlandpolitics.com/blog/?p=1565#comment-138</guid> <description>I guess no one is going to explain the term &quot;pretext&quot; as to the issues with Ristow.
If she ALL of a sudden had these disciplinary issues come up, then we might have a pretext to retaliation.  Pretty simple to look through the smoke.
Who spoke on the behalf of Ristow when she was being interviewed? I doubt Ristow could call BS on much, unless she is very experienced on issues of retaliation.
Is there a record within that office that would show that other employees have been disciplined for similiar acts as Ristow? If not, then that might answer a few other questions.
Mr.Richard Marca is mistaken if he thinks this vindicates his client.  I have read more than a few cases where someone was cleared by investigators and later found responsible for their actions.
Yes O.J.Simpson was acquitted of murder, the civil jury wasn&#039;t so convinced and OJ has what, a $33 million dollar judgement against him that he has not settled.
I guess these exibits that are part of the report also clear Ramos?
If Ramos is so clean, then why wasn&#039;t he cleared when the BOS spent the first $75k. GOOD investigators can see BS in short order if they know what their doing.
I will submit that lawyers milk everything they can down to the last penny. God forbid if they could get things done right the first time around.
Guess we will wait and see.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess no one is going to explain the term &#8220;pretext&#8221; as to the issues with Ristow.</p><p>If she ALL of a sudden had these disciplinary issues come up, then we might have a pretext to retaliation.  Pretty simple to look through the smoke.</p><p>Who spoke on the behalf of Ristow when she was being interviewed? I doubt Ristow could call BS on much, unless she is very experienced on issues of retaliation.</p><p>Is there a record within that office that would show that other employees have been disciplined for similiar acts as Ristow? If not, then that might answer a few other questions.</p><p>Mr.Richard Marca is mistaken if he thinks this vindicates his client.  I have read more than a few cases where someone was cleared by investigators and later found responsible for their actions.</p><p>Yes O.J.Simpson was acquitted of murder, the civil jury wasn&#8217;t so convinced and OJ has what, a $33 million dollar judgement against him that he has not settled.</p><p>I guess these exibits that are part of the report also clear Ramos?</p><p>If Ramos is so clean, then why wasn&#8217;t he cleared when the BOS spent the first $75k. GOOD investigators can see BS in short order if they know what their doing.</p><p>I will submit that lawyers milk everything they can down to the last penny. God forbid if they could get things done right the first time around.</p><p>Guess we will wait and see.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
